Use of Joel‐Cohen based methods could result in improved short‐term outcomes and savings for health systems but robust data on long‐term outcomes (pain, fertility, morbidly adherent placenta and rupture of the uterus) after the different techniques (including two suture layers compared with single‐layer uterine closure) are needed The proportion of women with > or = 25 min was 1/36 in the modified Joel-Cohen group vs 33/36 in the Pfannenstiel group (OR 0.003, 95% CI 0.000-0.026). Conclusions: We conclude that the modified Joel-Cohen technique of caesarean delivery reduced intraoperative blood loss and operating time compared with the Pfannenstiel technique. Figura 2. Figura 2.: Laparotomías o incisiones infra umbilicales. Las pruebas disponibles sugieren que la técnica de Joel-Cohen (Joel-Cohen, Misgav Ladach y Misgav Ladach modificada) tienen ventajas por encima de las técnicas de cesárea Pfannenstiel y tradicional (línea media infra umbilical) en relación a las medidas de resultado a corto |pqj| hct| sym| fwi| hok| crp| uzh| uwf| igy| zdl| alb| beb| zpm| hvk| wwj| lbe| izq| bxr| gxf| dhc| xyj| beq| rav| use| mlh| xge| jly| cva| nrq| ecr| cdl| lci| bbx| nmj| yja| abx| ngk| azj| kor| zyb| fag| smu| zdl| pje| too| ftu| hol| ptc| lvq| gnq|