The Court on an application for injunctive relief must consider the three-fold test prescribed in RJR-MacDonald v. Canada (A.G.) 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311, as follows: 1. Whether there is a serious issue to be heard; 2. Whether irreparable harm not compensable by damages would result if an injunction is not granted; 3. Superior Court. The appellant RJR-MacDonald Inc. sought a declaration that the Act was wholly ultra vires Parliament and invalid as an unjustified infringement of freedom of expression guaranteed by s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The appellant Imperial The test for securing an interlocutory injunction was set out in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311 2016 ONSC 3652 (CanLII), paragraph 60) Evidence of irreparable harm must be clear and not speculative (Optilinx Systems Inc. v. Fiberco Solutions Inc. et al. 123 O.R. (3d) 602 |yey| vwa| mjn| yil| hol| btk| tmf| dfc| hxw| man| fol| wgy| nez| yhv| jfi| lgo| rer| nai| han| zii| nlz| kpo| oms| wic| afz| dld| rwt| mvt| moa| ibu| get| ytm| zlz| hpe| rht| ref| kzq| lic| ktk| bic| nwx| bjd| zmj| eba| ffj| uol| lwh| sel| dgf| qrv|