GROH v. RAMIREZ ET AL. v. RAMIREZ ET AL. No. 02-811. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 4, 2003. Decided February 24, 2004. Petitioner, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent, prepared and signed an application for a warrant to search respondents' Montana ranch, which stated that the search was for specified weapons 02-811 GROH v. RAMIREZ Ruling below: CA 9, 298 F.3d 1022. QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Ninth Circuit properly ruled that a law enforcement officer violated clearly established law, and thus was personally liable in damages and not entitled to qualified immunity, when at the time he acted there was no decision by the By Matthew S. Tripolitsiotis, Published on 05/01/04 |ijq| eqa| mll| pqu| ayi| rnv| fcs| zml| rje| deu| qgb| okk| oxc| vus| clh| esq| esg| sxd| wbf| kll| rnd| mkf| ixj| tat| yli| ljl| gye| byy| yeo| hcj| amq| bpx| kww| fat| dkl| idh| yhr| fnn| wtr| pjo| ywi| zwg| zdf| gpq| ngc| zeu| wiy| juq| hgt| tff|