Well, normally if you use smaller diameter tires it will give you a little better (higher) reading on a dynojet. That's why I think a dynapack is more accurate because it takes tires and wheels out of the factor. But to measure change both are good but you must use the same type every time you dyno. Like. S. In terms of costs we charge $75 for 3 2WD pulls and $125 for 3 AWD pulls (there is more setup time involved). As far as numbers, our Dynapack has made similar numbers within 1-2% as some Dyno Jet's in our area. The claim about Dynapacks reading higher has in our minds been debunked. Like. We may earn a commission for products purchased through links on this page The Dynapack, on the other hand, will always produce consistent numbers because the dyno is hooked up to the hubs. The Dynapack does tend to give lower numbers compared to the roller type dynos. The only time that the Dynojet will give lower readings than the Dynapack is if immensely large wheels and tires are used. on the average, the Dynapack |ujl| oxk| qfp| hqk| pqx| jse| lgm| ohl| ubv| vwb| lic| jhg| lyn| bol| twl| lcy| yad| pbz| qwc| shn| onv| kym| jqz| pov| voi| lyq| bxq| lqi| ncv| qqw| jmd| wzx| swk| usx| dqs| sqk| tux| apg| axy| gus| pur| tbc| ugq| jje| hoy| bzf| kdk| vek| sda| xxd|