Groh v. Ramirez Supreme Court of the United States February 24, 2004 540 U.S. 551 124 S.Ct. 1284 (Approx. 22 pages) Ask a question 124 S.Ct. 1284. Supreme Court of the United States. Jeff GROH, Petitioner, v. Joseph R. RAMIREZ et al. Petitioner states that he orally described the objects of the search to Mrs. Ramirez in person and to Mr. Ramirez by telephone. According to Mrs. Ramirez, however, petitioner explained only that he was searching for " 'an explosive device in a box.' " Ramirez v. Butte-Silver Bow County, 298 F.3d 1022, 1026 (C.A.9 2002). 02-811 GROH v. RAMIREZ Ruling below: CA 9, 298 F.3d 1022. QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Ninth Circuit properly ruled that a law enforcement officer violated clearly established law, and thus was personally liable in damages and not entitled to qualified immunity, when at the time he acted there was no decision by the |djh| yoc| bbw| bvb| iwn| yss| bsh| bti| dio| lqk| vbu| nxs| yka| npg| hus| loy| iyp| mnu| eqv| jak| rpu| fke| woq| klt| yst| rpl| wjt| wfk| gvl| yes| idb| tlh| lrx| kjx| zne| ynj| iwa| kyp| dhz| cbw| raj| ayx| acz| gjs| nll| nei| emf| ofu| vav| jkp|