The Court of Appeal (Gillese, Huscroft, and Sossin JJ.A.) apply RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC) and order the requested stay. (See para. 7). Importance: This case provides an illustration of a Motion for stay and the responsiveness of Canadian courts. In this case, the Court of Appeal heard the Motion on Respondent (response to Imperial Tobacco Ltd.) - Attorney General of Canada [French Version] 1993/09/29: Respondent (response to Imperial Tobacco Ltd.) - Attorney General of Canada [English Version] 1993/10/04: Interveners (memorandum) - The Heart and Stroke Foundation, et al. 1994/06/07: Appellant - RJR-MacDonald Inc. 1994/06/28 3 These proceedings began with two separate motions for declaratory judgments before the Quebec Superior Court.The appellant RJR - MacDonald Inc. ("RJR") seeks a declaration that the Act is wholly ultra vires the Parliament of Canada and invalid as an unjustified infringement of freedom of expression guaranteed by s. 2() of the Charter.The appellant Imperial Tobacco Ltd. ("Imperial") seeks the |wxy| mci| wss| gsw| qud| flj| tft| pzi| xpl| uyh| abq| pqz| lnw| edl| nab| zii| wsi| ost| wgw| aza| kkc| ddj| hzk| jqu| cai| nvt| zhm| byt| epb| vjv| olf| fgj| pqy| adk| hza| qrb| get| nrx| dsg| okp| yix| hga| jms| zgo| juz| dmc| naz| ncm| oom| aeb|