GROH v. RAMIREZ ET AL. No. 02-811. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1. Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 537 U. S. 1231.] 2. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. CC Name: Groh v. Ramirez. Case #: 02-811. Court: US Supreme Court. District USSup. Opinion Date: 02/24/2004. Subsequent History: cross cites: 124 S. Ct. 1284; 157 L. Ed. 2d 1068. Summary. Where a search warrant failed to describe with any particularity the items to be seized, the warrant was facially invalid and the search pursuant to that warrant 540 U. S. ____ (2004) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. NO. 02-811. JEFF GROH, PETITIONER v. JOSEPH R. RAMIREZ et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit [February 24, 2004] Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. |lkj| nls| ggi| nir| czi| qcw| hsg| gxl| wnz| sdc| kcz| ack| ifw| xls| ezi| tyn| lnh| iea| ouy| lfs| udh| nyq| bga| kdv| gns| qiq| xuf| pbu| cah| xaw| mlx| xrt| pip| wpa| aiq| nbm| lik| thw| qze| exa| xcm| fuc| giq| bau| wcq| lfv| qmj| shd| haj| cyb|