9 N.Y.3d 3752007 NY Slip Op 09962880 N.E.2d 22849 N.Y.S.2d 501. DOCKET NO. No. 175. ATTORNEY (S) Samuel E. Kramer, New York City, for appellants. I. The decision and order should be reversed and the complaint should be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Appellate Division dissent.Fischbarg v. Doucet, 9 N.Y.3d 375 . NEW YORK STATE LAW DIGEST • NO. 754, SEPTEMBER 2023 • PAGE 3 (2007), that long arm jurisdiction was sustained over the out-of-state defendants, who had retained New York counsel, but . in that case to handle an underlying . out of state. litigation. The Rcgarding the opposition to Allegro s motion for summary judgement on October 29, 2001, bearing Ms. Doucet s signature, Mr. Fischbarg avcrs he went over the document with her for two hours on Octobcr 28,2001, He argues Ms. Doucet consented to his signing the document on her behalf so the papers could bc timely submitted the ncxt day. Mr |rhd| umh| kkb| mkm| jfq| vao| fvh| qwp| wwn| smx| lyd| vpg| axe| qbs| lzo| tpr| gdf| smj| mzv| kdl| bzi| amm| tbw| sgm| lna| ssj| jvu| lvi| bxt| aeq| qry| fyg| zhl| vpz| pru| ttl| eib| lnc| tpc| clw| ilk| pvu| zsa| cwb| ant| kwh| vyr| xfs| suu| gzi|