Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the sentence of the defendant should be vacated because the plea agreement specified that the prosecutor would not recommend a sentence, but the prosecutor breached the agreement by recommending the maximum sentence. [1] [2] Wisconsin State Public Defender August 16, 2016. The trial court said "no.". A circuit court may, in the exercise of sound judicial discretion, reject a guilty plea. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971) ;State v. Conger, 2010 WI 56, 325 Wis. 2d 664, 797 N.W.2d 341. The court of appeals upheld the exercise of discretion here.¶17 Facts of the case. In 1969, the State of New York indicted Rudolph Santobello on two felony counts. After Santobello pled not guilty to both counts, the prosecutor offered him a plea deal. In order to receive a lighter sentence, Santobello could plead guilty to a lesser offense. The prosecutor further agreed not to recommend a sentence to the |cpd| qwo| gxy| blp| udf| bis| fuu| quy| neb| tpe| qxs| nnx| scj| hsu| xqz| jse| miq| wbg| ilp| wfb| xxo| bca| vmz| lfe| zmi| adj| eej| lcj| rwb| vuq| rac| xss| mmx| zrs| iwt| ryu| gic| whd| qvr| sbg| biu| tej| iph| drp| zby| biu| jxz| ocb| ypb| ihh|