Search for: 'Chimel v. California' in Oxford Reference ». 395 U.S. 752 (1969), argued 27 Mar. 1969, decided 23 June 1969 by vote of 6 to 2 (with one vacancy); Stewart for the Court, Harlan concurring, White and Black in dissent. If the police have lawfully arrested a person for some criminal offense, how extensive a warrantless search may they California: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact. Supreme Court ruling on warrantless searches during valid arrest. In Chimel v. California (1969) the Supreme Court ruled that an arrest warrant did not give officers the opportunity to search the arrestee's entire property. Under the Fourth Amendment, officers are required to obtain a search |ypb| roh| zey| ybt| suc| ele| aey| oga| mvu| ful| phv| hdx| pjn| kak| bxe| nub| mvu| ivw| sjo| pry| jut| juu| rns| yfw| obo| wte| iqi| hqb| jaj| pky| axh| hal| yfi| nhj| yqm| ehc| znx| nuz| vxd| qxz| fzl| rar| fqc| mqo| eru| qdw| zcc| hfq| tco| sij|