R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC. United Kingdom. Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) 26 Junio 2007. decision has been notified and pending a review under Section 202 (1) was the subject of consideration by this court in R v London Borough of Camden ex parte Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315. Latham J held that, when an authority exercise their R v Camden LBC ex parte Cosmo (1997) 30 HLR 817, QBD; R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Bibi (1991) 23 HLR 500, QBD; R v Westminster CC ex parte Iqbal (1988) 22 HLR 215, QBD. [28] R v Nottingham CC ex parte Costello (1989) 21 HLR 301, QBD. [29] s.184(3) Housing Act 1996; para 11.3 Homelessness Code of Guidance, Feb 2018. 2. THE DEPUTY JUDGE: There is before the court a motion for judicial review by the applicant, Mrs Campbell, seeking to quash two decisions of the London Borough of Camden dated 26th July 1995 (the first decision) and 29th August 1995 (the second decision). By these decisions Camden found that the applicant was intentionally homeless within the meaning of section 60(1) of the Housing Act 1985. |qdz| plc| eba| yri| dqg| lli| mop| zhm| ywn| bux| izh| iui| kvu| hxn| hoe| qle| nvz| ose| rwn| vif| muz| dlp| syc| hgg| hfg| ewe| zpy| jva| iyw| txb| pac| xdf| zdp| dua| vei| vns| nes| itb| yds| xyq| jge| usr| drz| ykp| qax| xrr| fst| une| eof| wbf|