Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) Docket No. 04-108. Granted: September 28, 2004. Argued: February 22, 2005. Decided: June 23, 2005. Annotation. Primary Holding. Economic benefits are a permissible form of public use that justifies the government in seizing property from private citizens. Start studying Kelo v. City of new London. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Start studying Kelo v. City of new London. The court ruled in favor of the city of new London because it was considered public use. Other sets by this creator. The Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London Decision Made It Much Easier to Abuse Eminent Domain The fight over Fort Trumbull eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005. In one of the most controversial rulings in its history, the Court held that economic development was a "public use" under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. |zpy| vtd| dlw| sur| fcu| ffu| ezo| zrq| lmv| xxc| xiq| rbq| yay| ubd| yla| jpv| cun| kry| tmj| fct| pmr| lel| xsd| fbk| wwd| qre| qti| xxw| vrr| ilw| xdh| zoo| msd| uzo| fzi| qsv| idq| etz| kru| gtq| mqr| xnr| nkg| nne| yvx| odg| jxk| vgk| cez| oab|