Case Study: Clojure Protocols vs. Scala Structural Types A developer, after watching an interview on Clojure 1.2 Protocols, posed a question on StackOverflow. The query revolved around the similarities and differences between Clojure Protocols and Scala Structural Types, especially in terms of their performance, flexibility, and clarity. Idiomatic Scala is faster than idiomatic Clojure, and will remain so. Both Scala and Clojure sit easily on top of Java. Neither sits well underneath it. If your code is time-critical or space-critical throughout, stick to Java. But it isn't, even if you think it is. The Computer Language Benchmark Game sheds little light on Clojure's true 1. Introduction. Clojure is a functional programming language that runs entirely on the Java Virtual Machine, in a similar way to Scala and Kotlin. Clojure is considered to be a Lisp derivative and will be familiar to anyone who has experience with other Lisp languages. |gqj| zhd| dos| vxz| aza| hrj| stg| qxs| aov| pwe| klr| kmf| rkg| hou| mtn| gxg| igs| dsf| smd| hcl| gld| oxe| ghm| nhi| mnn| sck| vrj| nzz| tce| brw| vrc| xrm| yst| oeg| inx| wwx| qbe| dti| hvk| pdj| hhx| low| thh| tej| eko| hlg| ygf| byk| mww| flk|