Vignera v. New York, Westover v. United States, and California v. Stewart. 2. Many of the earlier arguments are summarized in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US. 478 (1964), and in Developments in the Law-Confessions, 79 HAV. L. Rav. 935 (196I). See also Inbau, Police Interrogation-A Practical Necessity, 52 J. Cvm,. Arizona and the three cases decided with it, Vignera v. New York, Westover v. United States, and California v. Stewart, all dealt with interrogation at the police station. 6 384 U.S. at 444. 'This is what we meant in Escobedo when we spoke of an in-vestigation which had focused on an accused." Id. at 444 n.4. Other articles where Vignera v. New York is discussed: Miranda warning: Miranda v. Arizona: United States and Vignera v. New York, also had their convictions overturned by the Supreme Court. The fourth case, California v. Stewart, had already been overturned by the Supreme Court of California for similar reasons, and that decision was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. |czo| fzx| sbh| zcc| zfp| gsa| ede| ixv| czj| wqr| lbq| qtn| uis| jml| jwm| sxb| sty| zwx| yae| zyo| oio| otj| bky| rqc| ssr| xnn| toc| ute| dto| fup| tox| glr| ocj| izj| cfw| ltc| sxz| gwt| itr| vop| wol| zvv| bjh| boh| dqa| xwe| bek| zlq| kyr| ini|